You will read the summary of a case study then you must write the correct form of the words in CAPITAL letters.

Uber BV and others (Appellants) v Aslam and others (Respondents) was a significant UK Supreme Court case that revolved around the employment status of Uber drivers. The central issue was whether these drivers should be classified as "workers" rather than self-employed CONTRACT (2 p.) under UK law.

The claimants, a group of Uber drivers, argued that they were "workers" within the meaning of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the National MINIMIZE (2 p.) Wage Act 1998, and the Working Time Regulations 1998. They contended that their working conditions and the control EXERTION (2 p.) by Uber over their activities pointed to an employment relationship.
The SUPREMACY (2 p.) Court, in a unanimous decision, ruled in favour of the drivers, AFFIRMATION (2 p.) their status as "workers" under UK employment law. The Court emphasized that the CONTRACT (2 p.) documentation between Uber and the drivers did not accurately reflect the practical reality of their working RELATIONS (2 p.) . Instead, the Court looked beyond the terms of the contract to the actual working conditions and the EXTENSIVE (2 p.) of Uber's control over the drivers.

As a result of this ruling, Uber drivers became entitled to certain employment rights, including the national MINIMIZE (2 p.) wage, paid ANNUM (2 p.) leave, and rest breaks. The decision had significant implications for the gig economy, setting a precedent for other similar cases and highlighting the importance of correctly categorizing workers to SURE (2 p.) their legal rights and protections.